This AI-generated piece of music was among the first to alleviate concerns about unauthorized use of artists’ likenesses in the music industry. The song was crafted by a writer utilizing an AI word filter. Drake expressed his disapproval of the controversial track. Surprisingly, the song even garnered a Grammy nomination. The nomination raises questions about how a composition featuring a melody without the original artist’s consent or actual vocals could be recognized by the Grammys. Interestingly, Beyoncé has yet to win Album of the Year.
Imitating Abel Makkonen Tesfaye’s distinct voice, known as The Weeknd, was always going to be challenging. Even attempting to replicate 2Pac’s adlibs is unsettling, particularly within a different music genre.
Initially, the cover from “Dream Girls” wasn’t as unfavorable until Mariah’s distinctive whistle tones were added at the conclusion.
Instead of manipulating artists’ voices without authorization, why not appreciate the collaborative song by Rihanna and SZA? While the cover may not be inherently negative, its authenticity and production process raise discomforting questions.
Drake was unequivocally against his lyrics being used in Ice Spice’s track “Munch.” Universal Music, via Drake’s Instagram story, urged streaming platforms to refrain from promoting AI-generated tracks with the phrase “This is the last straw Iot,” a sentiment Drake echoed.
Ariana Grande and Beyoncé possess unmistakable voices, making it unwise to have one imitate the other. Beyoncé would likely not endorse such endeavors. Beyoncé’s rendition of “R.E.M.” is commendable for those interested in her interpretation of an Ariana Grande track.
Collaborating with Travis Scott on a track without his consent would not sit well with Drake. The history of collaborations between the two artists on songs like “SICKO MODE” and “MELTDOWN” is well-documented.
While Bruno Mars’s vocal tone bears resemblance to Michael Jackson’s “P.Y.T.,” the ethical implications of such mimicry are concerning. One can only hope Bruno takes the initiative to establish his unique style.
Aaliyah’s legacy should be respected, and while the cover is impressive, using it for amusement feels inappropriate. Cherishing the music she shared during her brief life is more fitting than exploiting it for entertainment.
The attempt to incorporate Carti’s style into Kanye’s composition feels forced, with Carti struggling to match the vocal range. The mismatch is evident and detracts from the overall quality.
Personal preferences dictate whether Travis Scott or Kodak Black’s sound is preferred in this context. The AI-generated glitches in the lyrics add an eerie resemblance to Mike Tyson’s voice at a music bar.
Reviving deceased artists through AI poses ethical dilemmas and is deemed unacceptable by many. The unnaturalness of such creations is unsettling and fails to capture the essence of the original artists.
While some fans may be excited about the collaboration between two beloved artists in this cover, the moral implications of resurrecting multiple deceased musicians are troubling. It’s one thing to revive one artist, but resurrecting two crosses a line. Additionally, the creation of lyrics without the artists’ approval, especially posthumously, raises ethical concerns.
The rendition heavily relying on Whitney Houston’s signature vocal techniques like chords, runs, and belts falls short. The uncertainty of how a deceased artist would interpret a song leads to chaotic interpretations in these AI covers.
