Written by 1:08 pm AI, Discussions

### King’s AI Progression: A Technological Evolution

The rising tide of sovereign AI – SiliconANGLE

“The world is currently witnessing a resurgence in artificial intelligence, as stated by Jensen Huang, the CEO of Nvidia Corp., in a recent interview.

Huang emphasized that the private sector, encompassing businesses ranging from major tech corporations to emerging startups in the software industry, was instrumental in triggering the initial wave of AI advancement. He highlighted the increasing involvement of governments in AI and the acknowledgment that each region and country must develop its own AI capabilities as key factors propelling the next phase of AI evolution. According to him, this approach is crucial for nation-states to cater to their distinct linguistic and cultural requirements and leverage their unique business strengths effectively.

Prominent software CEOs advocating for autonomous AI is not a new phenomenon. Arvind Krishna, the CEO of IBM Corp., echoed similar sentiments by calling for the establishment of national artificial intelligence computing centers and the creation of standardized datasets for specific AI applications. Krishna stressed the importance of every country possessing fundamental AI capabilities, including advanced language models for AI purposes.

The concept of ‘core AI’ stems from the idea of modern sovereignty, asserting that controlling such technology is essential for safeguarding and promoting national interests. This is crucial due to AI’s significant influence on various societal, economic, military, and cultural trends and outcomes. While some entities, like the U.S. government, advocate for a different approach termed digital solidarity, many proponents of digital sovereignty emphasize the strategic development and utilization of AI technologies by national governments to ensure national security, economic competitiveness, and cultural preservation.

Several initiatives focusing on core artificial intelligence strategies are emerging globally:

  • The American government, through Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Minister of State for Electronics and IT, is reportedly exploring initiatives to facilitate the development of AI capabilities in India by managing and providing access to American data.
  • Singapore’s AI Plan for Southeast Asia includes the establishment of a Large Language Model (LLM) to address the region’s unique linguistic and cultural requirements, distinct from Western standards.
  • The Netherlands is pursuing a Generative AI Vision, supporting the development of GPT-NL, the country’s proprietary large language model, to enhance its national AI capabilities.
  • Taiwan’s Sovereign Model Strategy involves the development of the Trustworthy AI Dialogue Engine (Taide), an LLM funded by the state to counter politically biased AI tools and enhance regional AI capabilities.

The active involvement of the private sector, particularly in the U.S. technology industry, is pivotal in advancing core AI initiatives, as exemplified by cases like Taiwan, Nvidia, and IBM. These collaborations are aligned with the concept of ‘open strategic autonomy,’ emphasizing the importance of independent action while fostering partnerships with governments and businesses.

Sovereign AI encompasses not only technology regulation but also broader considerations of AI as a strategic asset for governments. It involves coordinated efforts across key areas of technology development, including finance, workforce, software, and physical infrastructure. Governments pursuing core AI strategies are integrating AI into various national sectors such as defense, public safety, economic growth, and international relations.

The transition to core AI signifies a significant shift in how countries approach technology, offering potential benefits if nations like the U.S. and its allies collaborate to shape AI development in a manner that encourages self-sufficiency and discourages isolationist practices. However, this transition also poses risks of further fragmenting the global digital landscape, potentially leading to geopolitical tensions and conflicts over AI dominance.

Global cooperation and coordination, facilitated through platforms like the G7 and international forums, remain essential to mitigate potential conflicts arising from AI competition among nations. It is crucial for the U.S. and other key players in AI development to continue fostering global partnerships to ensure a harmonized approach to AI advancement.

Pablo Chavez, a senior fellow at the Center for New American Security’s Technology and National Security Program, and an expert in tech policy, previously served as the vice president of global state politics and public policy for Google Cloud until February 2022. This content was authored by him for SiliconANGLE.

Co-pilot Designer for SiliconANGLE/Microsoft”

Visited 4 times, 1 visit(s) today
Tags: , Last modified: February 20, 2024
Close Search Window
Close