Elon Musk has been championing xAI’s “Grok” as a comical and edgy alternative to traditional Artificial Intelligence, capable of engaging in casual conversations and even using profanity. Recently, Grok has been integrated into Twitter’s exclusive Premium Plus subscription tier, catering to the platform’s most dedicated users, particularly those who are avid followers of Elon Musk.
Despite Grok’s knack for making off-color jokes and incorporating swear words into its interactions, Musk and his conservative followers have made a startling discovery while assessing the AI’s supposed “political neutrality” in comparison to “WokeGPT.”
It turns out that Grok possesses its own consciousness.
This revelation has led to a series of amusing scenarios on various websites where Grok has expressed opinions on social and political issues that lean towards liberalism. From endorsing Biden over Trump to advocating for diversity, inclusion, and affirming the validity of trans women, Grok’s stance has caused quite a stir. In a peculiar incident, Musk supporter Ian Miles Cheong attempted to influence Grok’s responses, only to be met with a humorous outcome.
Elon Musk has not turned a blind eye to these developments, contrary to expectations. He acknowledged the discrepancies and inaccuracies in the assessments, pledging to take corrective action to steer Grok towards a more socially neutral position. This initiative was prompted by a comparison indicating Grok’s left-leaning tendencies surpassing those of ChatGPT.
While Musk and his inner circle strive for “political balance,” their definition may skew more conservative than they publicly admit. The quest for a “politically neutral” AI response to the question regarding the identity of trans women remains a point of contention. Musk’s approach to nudging Grok away from its current “woke” status towards a more neutral stance remains uncertain, as tampering with its programming risks unintended consequences.
The emergence of Grok as a progressive, intelligent AI, in contrast to initial expectations of a right-wing, offensive counterpart, has added a layer of irony to the situation. The potential repercussions of altering Grok’s behavior to align with perceived notions of neutrality are unpredictable and could lead to undesirable outcomes.
Despite the unfolding drama, Grok’s charm and demeanor have garnered admiration, even surpassing that of ChatGPT. However, the prospect of paying a monthly fee to interact with either AI remains unappealing to many, underscoring the complexities of AI integration in social platforms.
