NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — A pioneering legislative initiative in Tennessee is gaining momentum as lawmakers advocate for the introduction of the “ELVIS Act.” This innovative bill aims to enhance the legal protection of vocal artists by addressing the unauthorized utilization of their voices in artificial intelligence applications.
The core objective of the proposed legislation is to expand Tennessee’s current legal framework to encompass “voice” as a safeguarded personal right, aligning it with existing protections for an individual’s name, photograph, and likeness.
Dubbed the “ELVIS Act,” derived from “ensuring, likeness, voice, and image security,” this bill is specifically crafted to prevent the unauthorized exploitation of a singer’s voice, especially in the realm of music production and content creation.
The reception to this groundbreaking proposal has been mixed, with legal experts and industry insiders offering both support and reservations regarding its implications. While some view it as a necessary step to combat voice misappropriation, others express concerns about potential unintended consequences stemming from the bill’s language.
Champions of the “ELVIS Act,” such as acclaimed songwriter and musician Jamie Moore, underscore the critical importance of such legislative measures in safeguarding the integrity of their creative output from being exploited in AI-generated content.
Conversely, representatives from the Motion Picture Association have voiced opposition, highlighting perceived threats to freedom of speech, particularly in the context of producing films and television programs based on real-life events or personalities.
Amidst the ongoing debate, the current version of the bill has sparked discussions surrounding its potential impact on artistic expression and the entertainment industry as a whole. Legal scholar Joseph Fishman, among others, advocates for a more nuanced approach to ensure that the legislation does not unduly restrict creative pursuits like documentaries, biopics, and tribute performances.
While the underlying objective of the “ELVIS Act” is laudable, stakeholders across the board agree on the necessity for meticulous revision of the bill’s language to strike a delicate balance between protecting artists’ voices and upholding the principles of artistic freedom and expression.
⏩ Read today’s top stories on wkrn.com