Ed-tech companies must ensure that AI tools are developed with funding, data confidentiality, and a deeper comprehension of the risks and potential of technology within educational institutions.
Recently, the Software and Information Industry Association, in collaboration with prominent educational entities like Pearson, D2L, Instructure, McGraw Hill, and GoGuardian, released a set of recommendations termed as “guiding principles” for software development.
Sara Kloek, the vice president of education and children’s policy at the Software and Information Industry Association, emphasized the importance of providing early guidelines for companies venturing into AI technology to positively influence the learning environment.
These guidelines suggest that AI applications in education should:
- Cater to the requirements of students, teachers, and families while adhering to established learning principles and designs.
- Prioritize legal rights, educational equity, and inclusivity in creating effective learning environments.
- Uphold student privacy and data security in compliance with relevant regulations.
- Ensure clear communication to facilitate understanding and interaction with AI tools within the school community.
- Be developed by companies in collaboration with partners and educational institutions to elucidate the benefits and drawbacks of new AI technology.
- Embrace ethical standards, trustworthiness, and accountability practices to mitigate risks and promote the objectives of these principles.
- Involve the broader education sector to enhance educators’ and students’ proficiency in utilizing AI tools effectively.
Furthermore, accountability for ensuring online student safety, especially concerning AI, data utilization, engagement, and privacy, was underscored by Suzanne Bernstein from the Electronic Privacy Information Center.
The Software and Information Industry Association referenced the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the White House’s AI guidelines while formulating these guiding principles. Kloek stressed the necessity of making these principles easily understandable not only for businesses but also for school districts to enhance overall awareness of the technology.
As AI continues to evolve in educational settings, the importance of transparency and clarity in showcasing the benefits for students and teachers was highlighted by Kloek. While many educational organizations have started incorporating AI, there is a growing interest in leveraging advanced AI tools like conceptual applications.
A survey conducted by EdWeek Market Brief revealed that 55 percent of over 400 education business executives are utilizing AI, primarily in early assessment and online professional development. However, there is a need for schools to navigate the integration of AI in classrooms responsibly to foster creativity among students.
Suzanne Bernstein emphasized the significance of AI education within schools to empower students and teachers to discern the authenticity of AI-generated content. She advocated for a balance between business recommendations and governmental regulations to ensure online student safety and data protection.
In conclusion, when utilized appropriately, AI tools can significantly benefit educators across all levels of education, paving the way for a more technologically integrated learning environment.
