-
Reach out to the Workforce Executive Council immediately.
-
The significance of having employees proficient in artificial intelligence cannot be overstated, especially as businesses gear up to integrate conceptual AI into their operations and workforce. To prevent employees from lagging behind or being ill-prepared, the emphasis on on-the-job AI education becomes increasingly critical. However, employees need to grasp the art of directing AI platforms to deliver the desired outcomes, not delving into every technological aspect of generative AI.
If concerns about employees lacking robust conceptual AI skills arise, the most effective solution is on-the-job training.
John Blackmon, the Chief AI Officer of ELB Learning, a custom training organization utilized by prominent companies like Google, Mastercard, and GM for upskilling their workforce, highlighted a crucial point: “Your job won’t be taken over by AI. Instead, it will be assumed by someone who leverages AI if you don’t.” Understanding the distinction between skills and experience lies in comprehending the underlying processes, according to Blackmon.
The intricacies of conceptual AI for engineers and designers are akin to the complexities involved in phone or internet communications. Blackmon emphasizes that knowing how to enable platforms to generate the desired outputs is crucial for the general workforce.
Blackmon also stresses the importance of businesses instilling confidence in their employees’ ability to create conceptual AI inputs. Whether employees receive the necessary tools and training from their leaders significantly impacts their utilization of relational AI. Bryan Kirschner, the Vice President of Strategy at DataStax, a matrix database solution for relational AI software, noted the prevalence of ChatGPT among new employees and the imperative need for training to harness its capabilities effectively.
To bridge the AI skills gap, a significant portion of HR managers—58%, to be precise—plan to engage in mentoring and retraining programs, as indicated in a recent AI skills report from TalentLMS. Some fundamental concepts underpinning these efforts are outlined below.
Progressing with AI: Crawl, Walk, and then Run
Kirschner advocates for a phased approach to AI training, likening it to the progression of crawl, walk, and then run—albeit at a swift pace.
He cautions against employees embarking on relational AI journeys alone, emphasizing the necessity of a co-pilot, much like how a manager or trainer guides an employee. With proper training, individuals unfamiliar with conceptual AI can nurture their creativity and develop unique perspectives to address customer needs effectively.
Kirschner’s team at DataStax devised an AI maturity model that evaluates an organization’s proficiency in AI usage across four key dimensions: perspective, culture, architecture, and trust. This model outlines the most effective strategies for implementing conceptual AI, starting from the ground up to cultivating expertise.
For instance, the maturity model’s perspective thread commences with privacy by design and advances to real-time adaptation and continuous learning. On the other hand, the culture thread initiates with a values-driven organization and progresses to adjusting compensation structures to reward ethical judgment and regulatory involvement. Trustworthiness encompasses aspects like automated script creation and testing, as well as internal and external transparency.
Adopting AI Thoughtfully and Effectively
Blackmon underscores that upskilling for relational AI mirrors other training endeavors—it necessitates clear objectives and a thorough understanding of the target audience. Domestic working groups can aid businesses in navigating training and implementation processes securely, ensuring a comprehensive strategy development involving stakeholders from various departments.
Hasnain Malik, the HR Chair at Brainchild Communications, advises focusing on a smaller user base and specific feature goals to refine AI implementation gradually. This method allows for incremental expansion until confident enough to roll out to a broader audience.
To expedite AI initiatives, BigID, a data security software provider, offers a course outlining essential steps for adopting AI correctly, such as leveraging large language models to prevent data breaches, ensuring compliance, and mitigating risks associated with generative AI usage. Blackmon underscores the importance of input quality, highlighting the adage, “If rubbish goes in, rubbish going out.”
According to Carrie Hoffman, a Partner and Labor and Employment Attorney at Foley & Lardner, aligning AI initiatives with compliance measures is paramount. Striking a balance between flexibility and vigilance in AI-related activities is crucial, as noted by Shabbi Khan, a Patent Lawyer at Foley & Lardner. Khan emphasizes the importance of clear best practices guidelines to ensure employees understand expectations and safeguard sensitive information.
Oversight of AI Implementation
Maintaining vigilance and verifying output accuracy are essential aspects of conceptual AI training to combat potential errors or hallucinations that may arise. Automation bias, the tendency to trust machine-generated outputs implicitly, underscores the necessity for ongoing oversight to prevent erroneous conclusions.
Khan warns that as AI capabilities advance, detecting errors, especially subtle ones, becomes more challenging. Therefore, maintaining critical oversight remains imperative to ensure the reliability of AI-generated outputs.
In conclusion, Kirschner asserts that generative AI is poised to become the new gateway to businesses, necessitating ongoing retraining to empower employees to navigate the evolving landscape effectively.
